REALTIDE LIMITED

Company number 02422237 ·

Active

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Credit Analysis: REALTIDE LIMITED

1. Credit Opinion: CONDITIONAL

Reasoning: Realtide Limited demonstrates a solid track record of consistent equity growth and strong short-term liquidity, with net assets increasing from £369,470 (2016) to £948,820 (2025). However, the high leverage position (73% loan-to-value) and the limited financial disclosure inherent in micro-entity accounts create visibility concerns. The company files as a micro-entity, meaning no profit & loss statement, turnover, or detailed debt service metrics are available. Credit approval should be conditional upon obtaining full trading accounts, rental income schedules, and debt service coverage verification.

The property investment sector exposure also introduces concentration risk—asset values and rental income are sensitive to interest rate movements and market conditions.


2. Financial Strength

Balance Sheet Health - Positive Trajectory with Elevated Leverage

Metric 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
Total Assets £3,765,571 £3,769,049 £4,339,889 £3,563,554 £3,786,102
Total Liabilities £2,747,203 £2,819,969 £3,484,922 £2,684,918 £2,866,179
Net Assets £948,820 £854,429 £795,578 £747,701 £748,150
Gearing (Liabilities/Equity) 289% 330% 438% 359% 383%

Key Observations:

  • Consistent Equity Growth: Net assets have grown every year for the past decade, rising from £369,470 (2016) to £948,820 (2025). This represents cumulative retained profits of approximately £579,350 over 9 years—evidence of sound financial stewardship.

  • Active Deleveraging: Long-term liabilities reduced by £72,766 in the latest year (from £2,819,969 to £2,747,203). Gearing has improved from 438% (2023) to 289% (2025), indicating management is actively reducing leverage.

  • Property-Heavy Asset Base: Fixed assets of £1,123,623 represent the property portfolio. Current assets of £2,641,948 likely include investment properties held at fair value and cash deposits.

  • Loan-to-Value: Total liabilities (£2.75M) against total assets (£3.77M) yields approximately 73% LTV. This is at the upper end of acceptable for property investment companies but remains within normal parameters for buy-to-let portfolios.

  • 2023 Anomaly: The spike in total assets to £4.34M in 2023 (with corresponding liability increase) likely reflects a property acquisition or revaluation. The subsequent decline to £3.77M may indicate a disposal or valuation adjustment. This warrants clarification from management.


3. Cash Flow Assessment

Liquidity: Exceptionally Strong Short-Term Position

Metric 2025 2024
Current Assets £2,641,948 £2,645,426
Current Liabilities £69,548 £94,651
Net Current Assets £2,572,400 £2,550,775
Current Ratio 38.0x 27.9x

Analysis:

  • Outstanding Current Ratio: At 38:1, the current ratio is exceptionally strong. The company has minimal short-term creditor exposure (£69,548) relative to its current asset base (£2.64M). This provides significant headroom for debt service and operational requirements.

  • Working Capital Buffer: Net current assets of £2.57M represent a substantial liquidity cushion. Even if a significant portion of current assets are investment properties (which may be less liquid than trade debtors), the buffer remains comfortable.

  • Limited Cash Visibility: Cash figures are only available for earlier years (£107,452 in 2021; £13,067 in 2020). The absence of recent cash data is a significant gap—micro accounts do not require this disclosure, but it limits our ability to assess true liquidity quality.

  • Debt Service Concern: The long-term liabilities of £2.75M presumably include mortgage debt on the property portfolio. Without P&L data, we cannot calculate interest coverage ratios or assess whether rental income adequately services this debt. This is the primary gap in our assessment.

  • Retained Profit as Proxy: The £94,391 increase in net assets (2024 to 2025) suggests the business generated sufficient profit to service debt and retain earnings. However, this figure includes fair value movements on investment properties, which are non-cash items.


4. Monitoring Points

Risk Factor Metric to Monitor Current Status Concern Level
Leverage Loan-to-Value ratio 73% Medium
Debt Service Interest coverage ratio Unknown (no P&L) High
Asset Quality Property valuations vs. market Unknown Medium
Cash Position Cash & equivalents Not disclosed since 2021 Medium
Rental Income Occupancy rates & rental yield Unknown High
Interest Rate Exposure Fixed vs. variable mortgage split Unknown High
Related Party Intercompany balances/director loans Not disclosed Medium
Filing Compliance Accounts overdue status Current Low

Specific Monitoring Recommendations:

  1. Request full trading accounts before any significant credit facility. Micro-entity accounts provide insufficient visibility for proper credit assessment.

  2. Obtain rental income schedule showing tenant mix, lease terms, rental rolls, and occupancy rates. This is essential for assessing debt service capacity.

  3. Clarify mortgage terms—fixed vs. variable rates, maturity dates, and covenant conditions. With Bank of England base rate considerations, variable rate exposure could significantly impact cash flow.

  4. Investigate the 2023 asset/liability spike—understand whether this was an acquisition, revaluation, or refinancing event.

  5. Monitor for related party transactions—family-run businesses (multiple name shown to subscribers family members as directors/secretaries) may have intercompany arrangements not visible in micro accounts.

  6. Track quarterly for any deterioration in filing compliance or Companies House filings.


Management Quality Assessment:

The name shown to subscribers family has operated this entity since 1989 (35+ years), demonstrating longevity and stability. Consistent equity growth and active deleveraging suggest prudent financial management. Accounts are filed on time, and the company has maintained active status throughout. However, the choice to file as a micro-entity limits stakeholder transparency—whether this is purely for administrative simplicity or to obscure financial detail is unclear. No director disqualification records are apparent for the officers.


Names of the people mentioned are shown to subscribers. See subscription

Perspective: Business Credit Analyst · Model: glm-5.1 · Generated 24 September 2026