KOORI LIMITED

Company number 05922984 ·

Active

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Investment Risk Analysis: KOORI LIMITED

1. Risk Rating: HIGH

Justification: KOORI Limited exhibits extreme leverage with total liabilities of £4.7M against net assets of only £771,679, yielding a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 6:1. The company's liquidity position is precarious, with £2.8M of loans having migrated from long-term to current liabilities in the latest period, and its asset base is overwhelmingly concentrated in work-in-progress (property development stock) that must be successfully converted to cash to service obligations. The minimal share capital of £2 provides virtually no permanent equity cushion.


2. Key Concerns

Concern 1: Critical Refinancing Risk from Debt Reclassification

The most alarming development in the 2025 accounts is the shift of £2.8M in "other loans" from long-term creditors (2024: £3,044,000) to current creditors (2025: £2,801,000). This indicates these borrowings are now due within one year. Combined with existing bank borrowings of £1.54M also falling due within one year, the company faces approximately £4.34M in current debt obligations against cash of only £138,589. The ability to refinance or extend these facilities is critical to ongoing solvency.

Concern 2: Asset Concentration and Liquidity Mismatch

Current assets total £5.84M, but £5.5M (94%) is held in stocks (work-in-progress). Cash represents only 2.4% of current assets, and trade debtors are negligible at £4,862. This creates a severe liquidity mismatch—the company must successfully complete and sell property developments to generate cash for its near-term obligations. Any delay in development timelines, planning complications, or softening in the regional property market could quickly create a cash crisis.

Concern 3: Declining Net Asset Position and Minimal Equity Buffer

Net assets have deteriorated significantly from £1.46M (2021) to £771,679 (2025), a 47% decline over four years. With share capital of only £2, the entire equity base consists of retained earnings, which could be eliminated by a relatively modest decline in property valuations or project cost overruns. The company was technically insolvent as recently as 2017 (net assets of £-112,070), demonstrating the inherent volatility of this business model.


3. Positive Indicators

  • Profitability Indicated: Retained earnings increased from £709,554 to £771,677 in the latest year, suggesting the company generated approximately £62k in profit, demonstrating ongoing trading viability.

  • Regulatory Compliance: All filings are current with no overdue accounts or confirmation statements. The company has maintained consistent filing since 2006, indicating competent administrative governance.

  • Long Operating History: The company has traded since 2006 and has navigated through previous insolvency (2017) to restore a positive net asset position, suggesting management experience in managing through cyclical property development challenges.

  • Secured Lender Confidence: Bank facilities remain in place with £1.54M in current bank loans, suggesting lender comfort with ongoing operations despite the high leverage.

  • Positive Working Capital: At £1.13M, net current assets remain positive, though the quality of this working capital is heavily dependent on WIP realization.


4. Due Diligence Notes

Item Investigation Required
Other Loans (£2.8M) Identify the lenders, terms, interest rates, maturity dates, and any related-party connections. The migration from long-term to current suggests either a refinancing event or covenant breach. Determine whether these are connected to Redtale Holdings Limited or the individual PSCs.
Work-in-Progress Valuation Assess the nature, location, planning status, and expected completion timelines for the £5.5M in stock. Obtain independent valuations where possible. Understand the basis of the "lower of cost and net realisable value" assessment.
Redtale Holdings Limited Investigate this corporate PSC (owning 25-50% of shares and voting rights). Determine its financial position, relationship to the company, and whether it is the source of the "other loans." Related-party lending can create additional risks if terms are non-commercial or if the lender can call loans on demand.
Security Arrangements The accounts reference legal charges over land at Lorton Lane, Weymouth and Sweet Hill Lane, Portland, plus a floating charge over all assets. Determine the current value of these secured properties and whether the security covers the full £1.54M in bank borrowings.
Debt Service Capacity Calculate the company's actual debt service requirements (interest and principal) against projected cash flows from development sales. With only 2 employees, clarify whether project management is outsourced and how this affects cost structures.
Contingent Liabilities The accounts make no mention of contingent liabilities, guarantees, or commitments beyond what is reported. For a property developer, confirm there are no outstanding contractual obligations, warranty claims, or section agreements with local authorities.
Related Party Transactions Given the three-way PSC structure and the corporate shareholder, obtain full disclosure of all related-party transactions, particularly any loans between PSCs and the company.

Perspective: Investment Risk Assessor · Model: glm-5.1 · Generated 8 September 2026