KOORI LIMITED
Company number 05922984 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Investment Risk Analysis: KOORI LIMITED
1. Risk Rating: HIGH
Justification: KOORI Limited exhibits extreme leverage with total liabilities of £4.7M against net assets of only £771,679, yielding a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 6:1. The company's liquidity position is precarious, with £2.8M of loans having migrated from long-term to current liabilities in the latest period, and its asset base is overwhelmingly concentrated in work-in-progress (property development stock) that must be successfully converted to cash to service obligations. The minimal share capital of £2 provides virtually no permanent equity cushion.
2. Key Concerns
Concern 1: Critical Refinancing Risk from Debt Reclassification
The most alarming development in the 2025 accounts is the shift of £2.8M in "other loans" from long-term creditors (2024: £3,044,000) to current creditors (2025: £2,801,000). This indicates these borrowings are now due within one year. Combined with existing bank borrowings of £1.54M also falling due within one year, the company faces approximately £4.34M in current debt obligations against cash of only £138,589. The ability to refinance or extend these facilities is critical to ongoing solvency.
Concern 2: Asset Concentration and Liquidity Mismatch
Current assets total £5.84M, but £5.5M (94%) is held in stocks (work-in-progress). Cash represents only 2.4% of current assets, and trade debtors are negligible at £4,862. This creates a severe liquidity mismatch—the company must successfully complete and sell property developments to generate cash for its near-term obligations. Any delay in development timelines, planning complications, or softening in the regional property market could quickly create a cash crisis.
Concern 3: Declining Net Asset Position and Minimal Equity Buffer
Net assets have deteriorated significantly from £1.46M (2021) to £771,679 (2025), a 47% decline over four years. With share capital of only £2, the entire equity base consists of retained earnings, which could be eliminated by a relatively modest decline in property valuations or project cost overruns. The company was technically insolvent as recently as 2017 (net assets of £-112,070), demonstrating the inherent volatility of this business model.
3. Positive Indicators
-
Profitability Indicated: Retained earnings increased from £709,554 to £771,677 in the latest year, suggesting the company generated approximately £62k in profit, demonstrating ongoing trading viability.
-
Regulatory Compliance: All filings are current with no overdue accounts or confirmation statements. The company has maintained consistent filing since 2006, indicating competent administrative governance.
-
Long Operating History: The company has traded since 2006 and has navigated through previous insolvency (2017) to restore a positive net asset position, suggesting management experience in managing through cyclical property development challenges.
-
Secured Lender Confidence: Bank facilities remain in place with £1.54M in current bank loans, suggesting lender comfort with ongoing operations despite the high leverage.
-
Positive Working Capital: At £1.13M, net current assets remain positive, though the quality of this working capital is heavily dependent on WIP realization.
4. Due Diligence Notes
| Item | Investigation Required |
|---|---|
| Other Loans (£2.8M) | Identify the lenders, terms, interest rates, maturity dates, and any related-party connections. The migration from long-term to current suggests either a refinancing event or covenant breach. Determine whether these are connected to Redtale Holdings Limited or the individual PSCs. |
| Work-in-Progress Valuation | Assess the nature, location, planning status, and expected completion timelines for the £5.5M in stock. Obtain independent valuations where possible. Understand the basis of the "lower of cost and net realisable value" assessment. |
| Redtale Holdings Limited | Investigate this corporate PSC (owning 25-50% of shares and voting rights). Determine its financial position, relationship to the company, and whether it is the source of the "other loans." Related-party lending can create additional risks if terms are non-commercial or if the lender can call loans on demand. |
| Security Arrangements | The accounts reference legal charges over land at Lorton Lane, Weymouth and Sweet Hill Lane, Portland, plus a floating charge over all assets. Determine the current value of these secured properties and whether the security covers the full £1.54M in bank borrowings. |
| Debt Service Capacity | Calculate the company's actual debt service requirements (interest and principal) against projected cash flows from development sales. With only 2 employees, clarify whether project management is outsourced and how this affects cost structures. |
| Contingent Liabilities | The accounts make no mention of contingent liabilities, guarantees, or commitments beyond what is reported. For a property developer, confirm there are no outstanding contractual obligations, warranty claims, or section agreements with local authorities. |
| Related Party Transactions | Given the three-way PSC structure and the corporate shareholder, obtain full disclosure of all related-party transactions, particularly any loans between PSCs and the company. |