J.R. GILBERT ENGINEERING LIMITED

Company number 01719406 ·

Active

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Credit Analysis: J.R. GILBERT ENGINEERING LIMITED (01719406)


1. Credit Opinion: CONDITIONAL

Rationale: J.R. Gilbert Engineering is a long-established (1983) machining business demonstrating consistent equity growth and profitability. Net assets have grown from £270k (2017) to £611k (2026), with retained profits of approximately £64k in the latest year. However, working capital is thin and tightening, short-term creditors are rising, and cash reserves are declining. The company files under the micro-entity regime, limiting visibility into turnover, gross margins, and detailed debt structures. Any credit facility should be conditional on additional financial disclosure and appropriate security.


2. Financial Strength

Balance Sheet Health: Moderately Strong but with Leverage Concerns

Metric 2026 2025 Movement
Fixed Assets £839,483 £757,233 +£82,250
Current Assets £1,074,362 £1,013,992 +£60,370
Cash £120,008 £136,065 -£16,057
Current Liabilities £978,706 £907,872 +£70,834
Net Current Assets £98,369 £110,883 -£12,514
Long-term Creditors £302,763 £297,388 +£5,375
Provisions £24,086 £24,086 —
Net Assets £611,003 £546,641 +£64,362
P&L Reserve £606,128 £541,766 +£64,362

Key observations:

  • Equity trajectory is strongly positive. Net assets have grown every year since 2017, more than doubling over the period. The P&L reserve of £606k reflects accumulated retained earnings, indicating the business is self-funding and not distributing profits to the detriment of creditors.

  • Fixed asset investment is ongoing. The £82k increase in fixed assets year-on-year suggests continued capital expenditure on machinery — appropriate for a machining business (SIC 25620). This may be financed through the £302k long-term creditor balance, which likely includes hire purchase or equipment finance arrangements.

  • Gearing is moderate. Total external liabilities (£978,706 current + £302,763 long-term + £24,086 provisions = £1,305,555) against net assets of £611,003 yields a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 2.1:1. This is elevated but not unusual for an asset-heavy engineering business where equipment finance is a standard funding method.

  • Share capital is nominal at £4,875, meaning the equity cushion is almost entirely built from retained earnings — a positive indicator of operational profitability over time.

  • Micro-entity filing limits transparency. No turnover, cost of sales, or profit-and-loss statement is filed. This restricts our ability to assess revenue trends, gross margins, or interest cover directly. The accounts text contains contradictions (referencing both FRS 102 and FRS 105), which suggests either a template error by the accountant or inconsistent reporting. This should be clarified.


3. Cash Flow Assessment

Liquidity: Adequate but Under Pressure

  • Current ratio: 1.10x (£1,074,362 / £978,706). This is positive but marginal. For a manufacturing/machining business holding stock and work-in-progress, a current ratio below 1.2x is a warning sign. The cushion between current assets and current liabilities is only £98,369 — less than 10% of current liabilities.

  • Cash position: £120,008, down from £136,065 in the prior year. While cash is positive, it represents only 12.3% of current assets, meaning the bulk of current assets (£954,354) is tied up in debtors and stock. If debtor collection slows or stock turns decrease, liquidity could deteriorate quickly.

  • Creditor growth is outpacing asset growth. Short-term creditors increased by £70,834 (7.8%) while current assets grew by only £60,370 (6.0%). This suggests the company is stretching supplier payments to fund operations or capital investment — a pattern that, if continued, could lead to supply chain friction.

  • Working capital trend is declining. Net current assets fell from £110,883 to £98,369, a deterioration of 11.3%. Over multiple years, if this trend continues, the company could slip into a net current liability position.

  • No turnover data available due to micro-entity filing, so we cannot calculate debtor days, creditor days, or stock days. This is a significant limitation for cash flow assessment. We also cannot assess interest cover on the long-term creditor obligations.

  • Employee headcount declined from 41 to 39, which may indicate cost management or natural attrition. The impact on productive capacity is unclear without revenue data.


4. Monitoring Points

If a facility is extended, the following should be monitored:

  1. Working capital ratio — Track current assets vs. current liabilities quarterly. A current ratio falling below 1.0x would be a covenant breach trigger. Request management accounts to monitor this between filing dates.

  2. Cash position — The declining cash balance (£136k → £120k) should be watched. A drop below £75k would signal acute liquidity stress given the £978k of short-term obligations.

  3. Creditor stretching — Short-term creditors grew 7.8% year-on-year. Request aged creditor reports to confirm suppliers are being paid within terms. Deterioration here could indicate underlying cash flow difficulties not visible in annual filings.

  4. Long-term creditor profile — The £302,763 long-term creditor balance needs clarification. Is this equipment finance, director loans, or bank lending? Understanding the amortisation schedule and security position is essential for any lending decision.

  5. Turnover and margin data — Require management accounts showing turnover, gross margin, and EBITDA for at least the last 12 months. Without this, debt service capacity cannot be properly assessed. Micro-entity filing should not be accepted as a reason for non-disclosure in a commercial credit context.

  6. Fixed asset composition — Given £839k in fixed assets, confirm what these comprise (freehold property, machinery, vehicles) and whether they are unencumbered. This is relevant for security availability.

  7. Director and PSC alignment — Note that name shown to subscribers is a PSC (25-50% ownership) but is not listed as a director. The two serving directors (name shown to subscribers and Haldar) and the PSC structure should be understood to ensure clear decision-making authority for any credit agreement.

  8. Filing consistency — The accounts text references both FRS 102 and FRS 105, which is contradictory. Ensure the accountant (Phil Bessant Limited) clarifies the applicable reporting standard. While not necessarily a red flag, it suggests a lack of attention to detail in preparation.


Names of the people mentioned are shown to subscribers. See subscription

Perspective: Business Credit Analyst · Model: glm-5.2 · Generated 14 October 2026