FARONCELL LIMITED
Company number 01358971 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Investment Risk Analysis: Faroncell Limited (01358971)
1. Risk Rating: LOW
Faroncell Limited presents a low risk profile based on available financial data. The company maintains a strongly positive net asset position of approximately £799,000, with negligible liabilities of £41,268 and substantial cash reserves of £675,120 as at 31 March 2025. The company has been actively trading since 1978 and has demonstrated consistent accumulation of shareholders' funds over the past decade, growing from £674,201 in 2016 to £799,040 in 2025. All statutory filings are current and not overdue.
2. Key Concerns
i. Significant Cash Decline Year-on-Year
Cash at bank decreased from £1,035,305 (March 2024) to £675,120 (March 2025), a reduction of approximately £360,000 (35%). While this appears largely explained by the simultaneous reduction in creditors from £453,851 to £41,268 — indicating a deliberate deleveraging exercise — the magnitude of the cash drawdown warrants verification that no other outflows (such as dividends or capital distributions) occurred that are not visible in the filleted accounts.
ii. Limited Financial Disclosure
The company files under the small companies regime with filleted accounts, meaning no Statement of Comprehensive Income (P&L) or cash flow statement is delivered to Companies House. This significantly limits the ability to assess revenue trends, profit margins, operating costs, and the sustainability of earnings. The accounts text confirms that "the Statement of Comprehensive Income has not been delivered" in accordance with Section 444 of the Companies Act 2006. Investors are reliant solely on balance sheet movements to infer performance.
iii. Static Stocks Holding
Stocks are reported at £111,731, unchanged from the prior year. For a company whose turnover (per the accounting policies note) comprises "rental income, service charge income and recoverable insurance receivable under operating leases," a stocks figure of this magnitude is atypical and its composition is unexplained in the filed accounts. The fact that it has not moved year-over-year could indicate an illiquid or obsolete asset that may require impairment assessment.
3. Positive Indicators
-
Strong solvency position: Total assets of £840,307 against total liabilities of only £41,268 yields a liability-to-asset ratio of approximately 4.9%, indicating very low gearing and minimal solvency risk.
-
Exceptional working capital: Net current assets of £799,039 provide an extremely comfortable buffer for short-term obligations. Current assets cover current liabilities approximately 20 times over.
-
Decade-long equity growth: Shareholders' funds have grown steadily from £674,201 (2016) to £799,040 (2025), indicating consistent profitability and retention of earnings without recourse to external funding.
-
Long corporate history: Incorporated in 1978, the company has operated for over 47 years, suggesting an established and durable business model.
-
Substantial deleveraging: The company reduced its liabilities by approximately £412,000 in the latest financial year, significantly strengthening its balance sheet and reducing financial risk.
-
Compliance: Both the confirmation statement and annual accounts are filed and up to date, with no overdue filings. The company is not in liquidation, administration, or receivership.
-
Directors' going concern assessment: The accounts state that the directors have "a reasonable expectation that the company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future."
4. Due Diligence Notes
-
Revenue and profitability: As no P&L is filed, the actual turnover, operating costs, and net profit for the year cannot be determined from public records. The company's SIC code (82990 — other business support service activities) does not immediately align with the accounting policy description of rental and service charge income, suggesting the SIC classification may be outdated or that the business has pivoted to property investment. The underlying property or properties generating rental income should be identified and assessed for occupancy, lease terms, and valuation.
-
Composition of stocks: The £111,731 stocks figure should be investigated. Given the rental income business model, this may relate to property-related work in progress, materials, or other inventories. The carrying value should be tested against net realisable value, particularly given the static nature of the balance.
-
Cash outflow analysis: The approximately £360,000 reduction in cash should be reconciled. While creditor reduction accounts for most of this, any dividend distributions, capital repayments, or other outflows to shareholders should be identified. The two PSCs (each holding 25–50% of shares) are distinct from the current directors, which may indicate a separation of ownership and management that warrants understanding.
-
Debtor reduction: Debtors fell from £94,475 to £53,456 (43% decline). This could reflect improved collection, reduced rental income, or write-offs. Given that rental income is typically recurring, a significant debtor reduction may signal tenant changes or rent adjustments.
-
Subsidiary structure: Fixed asset investments in subsidiaries are carried at £1 (nominal), suggesting either a minimal or dormant subsidiary. Any group structure and intercompany arrangements should be examined.
-
Audit exemption: The company is audit-exempt under Section 477 of the Companies Act 2006. While this is standard for small companies, the absence of independent external verification means all financial figures rely solely on directors' representations.
-
Relationship between PSCs and directors: The PSCs (name shown to subscribers and name shown to subscribers) are not listed as current directors, while the current directors (P G name shown to subscribers and I H name shown to subscribers) are not listed as PSCs. The governance arrangement and any service agreements between the directors and the company should be reviewed.