EVERYLIFE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

Company number 09233570 ·

Active

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

CREDIT ANALYSIS: EVERYLIFE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

1. Credit Opinion: DECLINE

Reasoning: This company is technically insolvent and entirely dependent on shareholder financial support to continue trading. Net liabilities of £8.04M against total assets of just £920k represent a severely impaired balance sheet with no capacity to service additional debt obligations. The going concern basis is explicitly qualified in the accounts, with material uncertainties noted. Accumulated losses have deepened year-on-year by approximately £576k, demonstrating ongoing operational losses. Cash reserves have declined by 61% in a single year. From a credit perspective, this represents an unacceptable risk profile – any facility would be subordinate to £8.5M in existing liabilities with no reasonable prospect of recovery from the company's own resources.


2. Financial Strength

Balance Sheet Position: Critically Weak

Metric 2025 2024 Movement
Total Assets £920,141 £1,513,734 -39.2%
Total Liabilities £8,505,000 £8,430,000 +0.9%
Net Assets (£8,044,887) (£7,468,634) Worsening
Shareholders' Funds (£19,525,759) (£18,949,506) Worsening
Share Capital £7,514 £7,514 Unchanged

Key Concerns:

  • Technical Insolvency: Liabilities exceed assets by £8.04M. The company has negative net assets and deeply negative shareholders' funds, meaning it has no equity cushion whatsoever.
  • Accumulated Losses: The P&L reserve shows accumulated losses of £19.5M, indicating the company has traded unprofitably since incorporation in 2014 – a decade of value destruction.
  • Non-Current Liability Dominance: Creditors due after more than one year total £8.5M, dwarfing the company's asset base. This is almost certainly related party/parent entity funding, but it represents a prior claim on any recovery.
  • Asset Erosion: Total assets have declined by 39% in one year, with cash falling 61% and debtors declining 11%. The business is consuming its asset base rapidly.
  • Minimal Tangible Backing: Fixed assets are only £58,765 (computer equipment), offering negligible security for any lending.

Capital Structure: The company is funded almost entirely through debt (predominantly long-term creditor balances) with negligible equity. The share premium account of £11.47M indicates historical equity investment, but this has been entirely eroded by accumulated losses.


3. Cash Flow Assessment

Liquidity Position: Deteriorating Rapidly

Metric 2025 2024
Current Assets £920,141 £1,513,734
Current Liabilities (£518,793) (£592,099)
Net Current Assets £401,348 £921,635
Cash £334,728 £856,876

Working Capital: While net current assets remain positive at £401k, this represents a 56% decline from the prior year. The working capital position is being sustained by declining debtors rather than operational cash generation.

Cash Burn: Cash has fallen from £857k to £335k – a reduction of £522k in a single year. At this burn rate, the company would exhaust its cash reserves within approximately 7-8 months without additional funding.

Debtors: Trade and other debtors stand at £584k, down from £656k. Without revenue figures (the company has elected not to file a profit and loss account), it is difficult to assess debtor days, but the absolute level is modest.

Creditor Position: Current liabilities have reduced from £592k to £519k, which may indicate some debt repayment or trade creditors tightening terms. The current ratio stands at approximately 1.77:1, but this is misleading given the overall insolvency.

Going Concern Dependency: The accounts explicitly state that the company is reliant on director financial support to continue as a going concern. This is a critical dependency – any withdrawal of this support would trigger immediate insolvency.


4. Monitoring Points

If any commercial relationship is being considered (which I would strongly advise against), the following metrics require close surveillance:

  1. Director Support Continuity: Written confirmation of ongoing financial support from Mr Batchelor should be obtained and refreshed annually. Any indication of withdrawal would signal imminent insolvency.

  2. Cash Position: Monthly monitoring of cash balances essential. The current trajectory suggests cash could reach critical levels within 6-8 months.

  3. Revenue Trajectory: The company has elected not to file its P&L account (permissible under small company regime). Request management accounts to assess whether revenue is growing and whether there is any path to profitability.

  4. Long-Term Creditor Movements: The £8.5M in non-current creditors requires clarification – are these shareholder loans, group financing, or third-party debt? Any demand for repayment would be catastrophic.

  5. Debtor Quality: With £584k in debtors, assess the age profile and collectability. Any impairment would further erode the already thin working capital.

  6. Filing Compliance: While accounts and confirmation statements are currently up to date, monitor for any delays which could signal governance concerns.

  7. Related Party Transactions: Given Mr Batchelor's >75% control, understand the nature and terms of inter-company arrangements and whether the business model depends on group structure support.

  8. Path to Profitability: The company has accumulated nearly £20M in losses over 10 years. Any credit decision would require a credible, detailed business plan demonstrating how and when the company will achieve sustainable profitability.


Summary Assessment

This is a venture-funded software business that has consumed substantial capital without achieving profitability over a decade of trading. The technical insolvency, explicit going concern qualification, rapid cash depletion, and complete dependence on shareholder financial support make this company unsuitable for conventional credit facilities. The business model (care management software) may have strategic value, but from a creditor's perspective, there is no reasonable expectation of repayment from the company's own resources. Any exposure would effectively be a bet on continued shareholder support rather than the company's standalone creditworthiness.

Perspective: Business Credit Analyst · Model: glm-5.1 · Generated 21 September 2026