51 CARGO SERVICES LTD

Company number 07150621 ·

Active

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Credit Assessment: 51 CARGO SERVICES LTD (07150621)


1. Credit Opinion: DECLINE

Reasoning: The company is balance-sheet insolvent as at 28 February 2025, with total net liabilities of £62,430. Total liabilities (£536,005) exceed total assets (£473,575), meaning creditors are carrying the business. The financial trajectory is deteriorating — net assets swung from a marginal £5,142 positive in FY2024 to negative £62,430 in FY2025, a £67,572 reversal. The company files micro-entity accounts with no audit and minimal disclosure, limiting visibility into revenue, profitability, and debt structure. A single director-owner (name shown to subscribers) with 75%+ control provides no governance checks and balances. The historical pattern is one of repeated insolvency events (negative equity in FY2016, FY2020, FY2021) followed by fragile recoveries, indicating structural financial instability rather than a temporary downturn.


2. Financial Strength

Balance sheet health is critically weak.

Metric FY2025 FY2024 Movement
Fixed Assets £49,008 £59,850 -18%
Current Assets £424,567 £451,345 -6%
Current Liabilities £366,941 £277,986 +32%
Long-term Creditors £169,064 £228,067 -26%
Net Assets (£62,430) £5,142 Deterioration
  • Negative equity position: The company's liabilities exceed its assets by £62,430. Under the Companies Act, this raises questions about the directors' duty to assess going concern and potential wrongful trading risk.
  • Asset quality concerns: Fixed assets declined by £10,842, suggesting depreciation without reinvestment or asset disposals. Current assets are predominantly in debtors/stock (cash position not disclosed in micro-entity accounts), raising questions about realisable value.
  • Creditor dependency: Current liabilities surged 32% year-on-year, indicating growing pressure from trade creditors or short-term loan facilities. The business is effectively operating on creditor finance.
  • Long-term obligations: £169,064 in creditors due after one year represents a significant claim against the asset base. Even if all current assets were liquidated at book value, the company could not cover total liabilities.
  • Historical instability: The company has oscillated between negative and marginally positive equity multiple times over the past decade, demonstrating an inability to build sustainable capital reserves.

3. Cash Flow Assessment

Liquidity is under severe pressure despite positive working capital on paper.

  • Working capital: Net current assets of £57,626 appear positive but have collapsed from £173,359 in FY2024 — a 67% reduction. This signals rapid erosion of short-term liquidity.
  • Cash visibility: Micro-entity filing requirements mean no cash position, debtor aging, or stock turnover data is disclosed for FY2025. In FY2021, cash was only £22,449 against current liabilities of £180,169, suggesting historically thin cash reserves.
  • Creditor deterioration: The 32% increase in short-term creditors (£277,986 → £366,941) is a red flag. This may indicate the company is stretching supplier payments to conserve cash, or that new short-term debt has been drawn down.
  • Revenue and profitability unknown: Micro-entity accounts do not require a profit & loss statement. There is no visibility into turnover, gross margin, operating costs, or net profit. It is impossible to assess debt service coverage or interest coverage ratios.
  • Employee costs: 14 employees on a micro-entity balance sheet of this size suggests a labour-intensive operation with ongoing payroll obligations that must be met regardless of trading conditions.

4. Monitoring Points

If any engagement is reconsidered in future, the following would require verification:

  1. Going concern statement: Confirm whether the director has assessed going concern and what assumptions underpin continued trading despite negative equity. A formal going concern note or director's letter would be essential.
  2. Creditor composition: Breakdown of the £366,941 short-term creditors — how much is trade payables vs. related party loans vs. bank overdrafts? Related party debt would change the risk profile.
  3. Debtor quality and aging: The £424,567 in current assets likely includes significant trade debtors. An aged debtor analysis and bad debt provision review are critical.
  4. Long-term creditor nature: The £169,064 in long-term creditors needs explanation — is this a term loan, director's loan, or deferred consideration? Security and repayment terms must be understood.
  5. Revenue and margin data: Full management accounts showing turnover, gross margin, EBITDA, and cash flow would be required to assess debt servicing capacity.
  6. Director's loan account: Given single ownership, there may be intercompany or director loan balances that could be subordinated — this needs clarification.
  7. Creditor days trend: Monitor whether the increase in short-term creditors reflects payment stretching, which could trigger supplier withdrawal and business disruption.
  8. Filing compliance: Accounts are currently up to date, but the company's history of financial distress warrants close monitoring of future filing timeliness.

Names of the people mentioned are shown to subscribers. See subscription

Perspective: Business Credit Analyst · Model: glm-5.2 · Generated 13 October 2026